Mat-Su Borough says AGDC analysis of Port MacKenzie is inadequate
The Matanuska-Susitna Borough added 145 pages to its argument that Port MacKenzie would be a better location than Nikiski for the Alaska LNG Project's natural gas liquefaction plant and marine terminal, and claims AGDC may have violated the National Environmental Policy Act and federal Clean Wa...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Document Type: | Press release |
Publisher: | Alaska Resources Library and Information Services (ARLIS) |
Date: | January 28, 2019 |
Bills/Acts; Orders; Treaties: | Clean Water Act National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) |
Series: | Alaska LNG Project updates
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Full Text View Full Text |
Library Holdings: | Print Versions |
Summary: | The Matanuska-Susitna Borough added 145 pages to its argument that Port MacKenzie would be a better location than Nikiski for the Alaska LNG Project's natural gas liquefaction plant and marine terminal, and claims AGDC may have violated the National Environmental Policy Act and federal Clean Water Act through its filings. The new governor, Mike Dunleavy, wants to open talks with North Slope producers. Meanwhile, the state team submitted more data to FERC on January 23, 2019, regarding wetlands, gravel fill, dredge material, pipeline yards, and pipeline offtake points. |
---|---|
Physical Description: | 4 pages |
Notes: | This update is provided to keep the public informed about the Alaska LNG Project. |