1
html disruption The motion was filed by Earthjustice on behalf of the Patuxent Riverkeeper the Maryland
2
liquefied natural gas terminal promotes pollution from fracking Earthjustice and other environmental groups
3
with Earthjustice who represented the environmentalists in the case decided July 15 disagreed with the ruling
4
The appeals were filed Dec 20 with the state pollution controls hearing board The law firm Earthjustice
5
supply In July environmental group Earthjustice filed a lawsuit on behalf of the tribe in federal court
6
on federal lands said Earthjustice attorney Michael Freeman The rules had set new requirements for well
7
for the environmental group Earthjustice One major point of contention was a requirement in a June draft
8
week The Sierra Club Earthjustice and the Center for Biological Diversity must convince the U S Court
9
communities said Elizabeth Calderon a senior attorney with Earthjustice focused on the Gulf Coast LNG build
10
John Smeltzer Moneen Nasmith a lawyer at Earthjustice arguing on behalf of the Sierra Club on Oct 21
11
president of policy and legislation at Earthjustice said the question is where the political middle ground
12
with Earthjustice called it a disturbing signal that the agencies and FERC would sign the MOU that aims to have
13
with Earthjustice which is representing environmental groups opposing Alaska LNG Courts can be influenced
14
for Biological Diversity EarthJustice and the Natural Resources Defense Council as well as local advocacy groups
15
The District Court must make additional findings before the pipeline can be shut said Earthjustice attorney Jan
16
by Earthjustice on behalf of the Patuxent Riverkeeper Sierra Club and Chesapeake Climate Action Network The groups
17
on behalf of itself and other groups including the Sierra Club and Earthjustice The estimated 38 7 billion