SUMMARY

Research efforts on wildlife species have documented a variety of responses to aircraft overflights. Responses may be short term or long term and may include changes in movement, activity, and behavior as well as changes in habitat selection and use. These changes may have negative impacts on wildlife populations.  Research was initiated in March 1999 to investigate the impacts of military overflight activity on Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli) in interior Alaska and to assess the effectiveness of current mitigation measures intended to reduce impacts on Dall’s sheep populations.  We investigated the impacts of military jet aircraft on Dall’s sheep using: 1) populations surveys; 2) productivity and survival rates in mitigated and non-mitigated areas; 3) behavior in relation to military overflight activity; and 4) daily movements, home range size, and habitat use in relation to military aircraft activity.

Two study sites were selected for intensive investigations of the effects of military overflight activity on Dall’s sheep.  One (Cirque Lake) is located in Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve and is overlain by airspace mitigated for Dall’s sheep.  Military aircraft flying over this area are restricted to flying 5,000 feet above ground level from May 10 - June 15 (lambing season).  Because the floor of this military airspace is 100 feet above ground level at other times of the year, sheep in this area may be exposed to a significant change in flying activity during the 1 month mitigation period.  The 2nd site (West Point) is located approximately 35 miles to the west of the 1st site and has no associated mitigation measure for Dall’s sheep. 

To investigate Dall’s sheep daily movements, home range size, and habitat use in relation to military aircraft activity, Global Position System (GPS) radiocollars were placed on sheep.  These collars record the time and location of the collared sheep. Ten sheep were captured at each site in March of 1999, 2000, and 2002 (20 radiocollared Dall’s sheep per year).  During March 2001, 10 sheep were radiocollared at West Point but due to problems locating sheep, only 7 were captured at Cirque Lake.  Weights of sheep were taken during the radiocollaring capture operation and a blood sample was drawn for pregnancy determination and disease screening.  A series of physical measurements were recorded for captured sheep.  Dall’s sheep mortalities were investigated as soon as was reasonable.

In addition to radiocollars, ground crews observed sheep before, during, and after Major Flying Exercises (Cope Thunders) and recorded sheep behavior.  Sound levels of overflight activities were recorded and used during analysis.  We analyzed Dall’s sheep behavior in relation to: the number of military aircraft we observed per day; behavior before, during, and after an overflight event; and, behavior during an overflight event relative to the sound level and the proximity of the overflight event.  Sheep behavior was analyzed as: the proportion of time Dall’s sheep were active; the feeding efficiency of Dall’s sheep; and the proportion of time sheep were engaged in bedding, standing, feeding, walking and running. 

Aerial surveys for Dall’s sheep were conducted with a helicopter in 8 study units within the interior Alaska, Military Operations Areas in June or July of 1997-2002.  We found no differences in population trends between areas mitigated and not mitigated for low-level military aircraft.  Although considerable fluctuation existed in sheep numbers in individual survey units, the overall sheep population in the Yukon-Tanana Uplands was relatively stable from 1997 to 2002 and there was little overall variability in the total count from year to year (coefficient of variation = 7%).

There were no statistical differences in the pregnancy rates, lamb to ewe ratios, or yearling to ewe ratios between Cirque Lake (mitigated) and West Point (non-mitigated).  There was a statistical difference in the mean body weights of captured ewes at the 2 study sites with ewes at West Point heavier than those at Cirque Lake.  In general, there was greater variation in pregnancy rates, lamb to ewe ratio, yearling to ewe ratio, and body weights among years than there was between study sites.  Survival rates of adult ewes were similar between the 2 study sites.

Field crews observed Dall’s sheep behavior, overflight activity and collected information on sound levels during 4 field sessions per year during 2000 and 2001.  Military overflight activity was extremely variable among years, seasons, and between study areas.  There was no difference in the number or frequency of overflights observed between the mitigated study site and the non-mitigated site.  There was no difference in the number of observed overflight before and after Cope Thunder excercises in comparison to during Cope Thunder excercises.  Loud and low overflight events were rare at both study sites.  The number of overflights we observed over Dall’s sheep on a given day did not influence Dall’s sheep behavior.  Significant differences occurred in the feeding efficiency of Dall’s sheep when behavior was examined in the 10 minutes before, during and 10 minutes after an overflight event.  In models that included all seasons, Dall’s sheep ewe feeding efficiency was higher after the overflight event in comparison to before the overflight event.  In models that just examined lambing season and early summer (May, June and July), sheep feeding efficiency was higher before the overflight event in comparison to during the event.  In models that considered the proximity and sound level of overflight events, a higher proportion of sheep were active with increasing sound levels.   In models that just examined lambing season and early summer, more sheep were active with closer military overflights.  In all models, factors other than military overflights, explained greater proportions of the variation in sheep behavior.  In particular, the date sequence (time of year of the field observation) nested within year and study site explained greater proportions of the variability that we observed in Dall’s sheep behavior than did military overflight activity.

We observed no significant effect of the number of military aircraft sorties launched on 2-week within-home-range scale: 1) total distance moved; 2) home range size; or 3) habitat use (proportional use of landcover classes and aspect classes, average elevation, slope, terrain ruggedness, and relative vegetation biomass.  However, there was substantial variance in total distance moved, home range size and habitat use between study areas, among years within study areas, and among 2-week sequential periods within years within study areas.  Once this natural variance was accounted for, the number of military aircraft sorties added no further explanatory power to the assessment of variance in sheep behavior and habitat use.

We conclude that the levels of military activity which we observed in this study during Major Flying Exercises (~60 sorties/day) generally did not cause significant effects on sheep behavior and habitat use at the home range scale when compared to the background level of military sorties (~ 20 sorties/day).  When statistical differences in feeding efficiency and activity of groups of sheep were observed, military aircraft activity typically accounted for a small proportion of the total variance in sheep behavior, the direction of these effects were variable for sheep, and there were no overt indications that military overflights affected sheep populations during 1999-2002.  Few of the overflights that we observed were low or loud and the mitigation measures in place at the Cirque Lake study site provided no detectable reduction in sheep response to military overflights.  We emphasize, however, that 1) the studied sheep population has had opportunity to acclimate to military overflights for over 20 years, 2) we made no comparisons to areas that were free of military overflights and thus cannot draw conclusions regarding the effect of the background level of military overflights on sheep behavior and populations, and 3) if the nature, intensity, or frequency of military flights in interior Alaska changes substantially compared to the situation described here, then sheep may respond differently than documented in this study.


ACKNOWLEGEMENTS

Funding and support for this project came from the United States Air Force through the 11th Air Force Resource Protection Council, and the Committees for Resource Protection/Mitigation and Research and Monitoring. In particular, J. Hostman, and the 11th USAF, was instrumental in ensuring we had the financial resources available to complete this project over the course of 4 years.  G. Rolf, USAF, provided insight into workings of Cope Thunders and Military Operations Area space as well as specific numbers on the number of sorties launched by the US Air Force during 1999-2002.  Dall’s sheep surveys and Dall’s sheep captures were accomplished with the expert flying skills of J. Hamilton, Arctic Air Alaska, and R. Swisher and S. Gibbon, Quicksilver Air.  Netgunning capture expertise was provided by B. Minor, Quicksilver Air.  H. Maier provided expert remote sensing input.  Behavioral observations in the field (some times under very challenging conditions) were accomplished with the help of M. Berger, J. Chakuchin, D. DiFolco, N. Guldager, R. Maclean, B. Mauer, K. Max, H. McCulloh, N. Pfeiffer, J. Porter, M. Swaim, D. Swanson, S. Swanson, D. Weisenel, K. Weller, B. Wendling, C. Whitaker, and B. Wisnosky.  We thank L. Adams, C. Gardner, J. Herriges, P. Krausman, T. Liebscher and G. Rolf as well as the members of the Committees for Resource Protection/Mitigation and Research and Monitoring for critical reviewing this document. And D. Beckstead converted this report to a web-based format for Internet distribution.

Table of Contents | Introduction

2004 Sheep Report
http://www.nps.gov/yuch/Expanded/key_resources/sheep/sheep_2004.htm
Doug Beckstead
December 8, 2004